Uncertainty-Quantified Kinetic Model Discrimination for Photocatalytic Reactor Design: A Bootstrap Based Framework

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Catalytic Process Design and Simulation Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.

Abstract

Translating laboratory-scale photocatalytic batch data into continuous reactor design remains a critical challenge in reaction engineering, particularly when kinetic model selection is based solely on the coefficient of determination (R²) and parameter uncertainty is ignored. In this study, a data-driven framework is developed that integrates nonlinear kinetic model discrimination, bootstrap-based uncertainty quantification, and uncertainty propagation into plug-flow reactor (PFR) sizing. Time–concentration data from methylene blue degradation over a WO₃/BiVO₄ photocatalyst (C0 = 10 mg L⁻¹) were fitted to six nonlinear kinetic models using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). Model discrimination was performed using the bias-corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) and Akaike weights, decisively selecting the Elovich model (ΔAICc > 30 vs. pseudo-first-order; Akaike weight > 0.99). Parameter uncertainty was quantified via nonparametric bootstrap resampling (2000 replicates), yielding well-constrained 95% confidence intervals (α: 2.02-2.28 mg g⁻¹ min⁻¹; β: 0.34-0.42 g mg⁻¹). The identified kinetics were embedded into a steady-state PFR model, and bootstrap parameter distributions were propagated to generate a reactor length design envelope for 90% pollutant removal. The nominal reactor length was 1.25 m, with a 95% confidence interval of 1.18-1.35 m (±7%). This narrow design envelope demonstrates robust parameter identifiability and provides a statistically defensible basis for reactor sizing, moving beyond single-point deterministic estimates. The proposed methodology offers a transferable framework for integrating nonlinear kinetic discrimination and uncertainty quantification into photocatalytic reactor engineering.

Keywords

References

[1] Herrmann, J.-M., 1999. Heterogeneous photocatalysis: Fundamentals and applications to the removal of various types of aqueous pollutants. Catalysis Today, 53(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00107-8
[2] Hoffmann, M.R., Martin, S.T., Choi, W., Bahnemann, D.W., 1995. Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chemical Reviews, 95(1), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00033a004
[3] Chen, X., Li, C., Grätzel, M., Kostecki, R., Mao, S.S., 2012. Nanomaterials for renewable energy production and storage. Chemical Society Reviews, 41(23), 7909–7937. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35230c
[4] Kudo, A., Miseki, Y., 2009. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chemical Society Reviews, 38(1), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1039/b800489g
[5] Monfort, O., Plesch, G., 2018. Bismuth vanadate-based semiconductor photocatalysts: A short critical review on the efficiency and the mechanism of photodegradation of organic pollutants. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(20), 19362–19379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2437-9
[6] Park, Y., McDonald, K.J., Choi, K.-S., 2013. Progress in bismuth vanadate photoanodes for use in solar water oxidation. Chemical Society Reviews, 42(6), 2321–2337. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35260e
[7] Grigioni, I., et al., 2022. Enhanced charge carrier separation in WO3/BiVO4 photoanodes achieved via light absorption in the BiVO4 layer. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 5(11), 13142–13148. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c02597
[8] Amakiri, K., Khan, M.M., 2025. Recent advances in photocatalytic reactor design and process optimization for effluent treatment. Sustainable Effluent Treatment and Resource Recovery, 2, 141–180. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2025-1518.ch007
[9] De Lasa, H.I., Serrano, B., Salaices, M., 2005. Photocatalytic Reaction Engineering. Springer.
[10] Mueses, M.A., Colina-Márquez, J., Machuca-Martínez, F., Puma, G.L., 2021. Recent advances on modeling of solar heterogeneous photocatalytic reactors applied for degradation of pharmaceuticals and emerging organic contaminants in water. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 30, 100486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100486
[11] Ollis, D.F., Pelizzetti, E., Serpone, N., 1991. Photocatalyzed destruction of water contaminants. Environmental Science & Technology, 25(9), 1522–1529. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00021a001
[12] Banga, J.R., Balsa-Canto, E., 2008. Parameter estimation and optimal experimental design. Essays in Biochemistry, 45, 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSE0450195
[13] Moles, C.G., Mendes, P., Banga, J.R., 2003. Parameter estimation in biochemical pathways: A comparison of global optimization methods. Genome Research, 13(11), 2467–2474. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1262503
[14] Spiess, A.-N., Neumeyer, N., 2010. An evaluation of R² as an inadequate measure for nonlinear models in pharmacological and biochemical research: A Monte Carlo approach. BMC Pharmacology, 10(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2210-10-6
[15] Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer.
[16] Rao, S.S., 2019. Engineering Optimization: Theory and Practice. John Wiley & Sons.
[17] Raue, A., et al., 2009. Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood. Bioinformatics, 25(15), 1923–1929. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp358
[18] Stine, R., 1989. An introduction to bootstrap methods: Examples and ideas. Sociological Methods & Research, 18(2–3), 243–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241890180020
[19] Davison, A.C., Hinkley, D.V., 1997. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge University Press.
[20] Ho, Y.-S., McKay, G., 1999. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochemistry, 34(5), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5
[21] Aharoni, C., Tompkins, F., 1970. Kinetics of adsorption and desorption and the Elovich equation. In: Advances in Catalysis, 21, 1–49.
[22] Avrami, M., 1939. Kinetics of phase change. I. General theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 7(12), 1103–1112. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1750380
[23] Weber Jr., W.J., Morris, J.C., 1963. Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solution. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, 89(2), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSEDAI.000043
[24] Langmuir, I., 1918. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 40(9), 1361–1403. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja02242a004
[25] Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R., 1995. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN'95), 4, 1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968
[26] Fogler, H.S., 1999. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering. Pearson Education.
[27] Behnajady, M., Modirshahla, N., Hamzavi, R., 2006. Kinetic study on photocatalytic degradation of CI Acid Yellow 23 by ZnO photocatalyst. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 133(1–3), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.10.022
Chemical Process Design
Volume 5, Issue 2
December 2026
Pages 89-109

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics