Comprehensive Evaluation of Distillation Methods for Water-Ethanol Separation: Energy, Exergy, and CO₂ Emission Analysis with Process Enhancement

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 School of Chemical Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 School of Chemical engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Department of Chemical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

4 School of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran.

5 School of Chemical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Azeotropic distillation (AD) and extractive distillation (ED) are two conventional methods for separating azeotropic mixtures. However, these processes consume a high amount of energy like other distillation columns. As an entrainer may significantly affect energy consumption, selecting a proper entrainer is considered a key parameter in designing AD and ED processes. In this study, three different entrainers were used to separate the azeotropic water-ethanol mixture. Two entrainers, benzene and cyclohexane, were used in the AD process, and ethylene glycol was used as an entrainer in the ED process. According to the results, the ED process with ethylene glycol entrainer outperformed the AD process with benzene and cyclohexane entrainer in terms of separation and energy consumption. Therefore, in order to reduce the energy consumption of the ED process with ethylene glycol entrainer, feed splitting (FS) method was used. In addition, to further investigation on these two processes, exergy loss, CO2 emission and TAC were calculated. Results showed that the ED process with heat integration reduced hot and cold utilities, respectively, by 94.33% and 60.56% relative to the AD process. Also, exergy loss, CO2 emission and TAC in the proposed ED process decreased compared to the basic ED process to the extent of 32%, 7% and 80.1%.

Keywords

References

[1] Li, X., Wu, Y., Li, H., Yuan, G., Chen, H., Gao, X., 2020. Intensification of 2-Methyl-1, 3-Dioxolane hydrolysis for recovery of ethylene glycol through reactive distillation: Kinetics and process design. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 154, 108012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2020.108012
[2] Weinfeld, J.A., Owens, S.A., Eldridge, R.B., 2018. Reactive dividing wall columns: A comprehensive review. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 123, 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2017.10.019
[3] Xia, M., Shi, H., Niu, C., Ma, Z., Lu, H., Xiao, Y., Hou, B., Jia, L., Li, D., 2020. The importance of pressure-sensitive pinch/azeotrope feature on economic distillation design. Separation and Purification Technology, 250, 116753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116753
[4] Zhang, Q., Li, C., Zeng, A., Ma, Y., Yuan, X., 2020. Dynamic control analysis of partially heat-integrated pressure-swing distillation for separating a maximum-boiling azeotrope. Separation and Purification Technology, 230, 115853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.115853
[5] Wang, C., Zhuang, Y., Liu, L., Zhang, L., Du, J., Zhang, Z., 2020. Design and control of a novel side-stream extractive distillation column for separating methanol-toluene binary azeotrope with intermediate boiling entrainer. Separation and Purification Technology, 239, 116581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116581
[6] Qi, J., Li, Y., Xue, J., Qiao, R., Zhang, Z., Li, Q., 2020. Comparison of heterogeneous azeotropic distillation and energy-saving extractive distillation for separating the acetonitrile-water mixtures. Separation and Purification Technology, 238, 116487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116487
[7] Paredes, D.A.F., Laoretani, D.S., Zelin, J., Vargas, R., Vecchietti, A.R., Espinosa, J., 2017. Screening of pervaporation membranes for the separation of methanol-methyl acetate mixtures: An approach based on the conceptual design of the pervaporation-distillation hybrid process. Separation and Purification Technology, 189, 296-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.08.027
[8] Domingues, L., Pinheiro, C.I., Oliveira, N.M., 2017. Economic comparison of a reactive distillation-based process with the conventional process for the production of ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE). Computers & Chemical Engineering, 100, 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2017.01.008
[9] De, D., Sai, M.S.N., Aniya, V., Jyothi, K.N., Satyavathi, B., 2019. Economic and environmental impact assessment of extractive distillation with renewable entrainers for reprocessing aqueous 2-Propanol. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 143, 107616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2019.107616
[10] Zhao, T., Geng, X., Qi, P., Zhu, Z., Gao, J., Wang, Y., 2018. Optimization of liquid–liquid extraction combined with either heterogeneous azeotropic distillation or extractive distillation processes to reduce energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 132, 399-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.01.037
[11] Nargotra, P., Sharma, V., Gupta, M., Kour, S., Bajaj, B.K., 2018. Application of ionic liquid and alkali pretreatment for enhancing saccharification of sunflower stalk biomass for potential biofuel-ethanol production. Bioresource technology, 267, 560-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.070
[12] Errico, M., Madeddu, C., Bindseil, M.F., Madsen, S.D., Braekevelt, S., Camilleri-Rumbau, M.S., 2020. Membrane assisted reactive distillation for bioethanol purification. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 157, 108110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2020.108110
[13] Mulia-Soto, J.F., Flores-Tlacuahuac, A., 2011. Modeling, simulation and control of an internally heat integrated pressure-swing distillation process for bioethanol separation. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 35(8), 1532-1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.03.011
[14] Fang, C., Wu, H., Lee, S.-Y., Mahajan, R.L., Qiao, R., 2018. The ionized graphene oxide membranes for water-ethanol separation. Carbon, 136, 262-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.077
[15] Franke, M.B., 2016. MINLP optimization of a heterogeneous azeotropic distillation process: Separation of ethanol and water with cyclohexane as an entrainer. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 89, 204-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.03.027
[16] Shang, X., Ma, S., Pan, Q., Li, J., Sun, Y., Ji, K., Sun, L., 2019. Process analysis of extractive distillation for the separation of ethanol–water using deep eutectic solvent as entrainer. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 148, 298-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.06.014
[17] Pan, Q., Shang, X., Ma, S., Li, J., Song, Y., Sun, M., Liu, J., Sun, L., 2020. Control comparison of extractive distillation configurations for separating ethyl acetate-ethanol-water ternary mixture using ionic liquids as entrainer. Separation and Purification Technology, 236, 116290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116290
[18] Shi, X., Zhu, X., Zhao, X., Zhang, Z., 2020. Performance evaluation of different extractive distillation processes for separating ethanol/tert-butanol/water mixture. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 137, 246-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.02.015
[19] Li, Q., Hu, N., Zhang, S., Wu, Q., Qi, J., 2021. Energy-saving heat integrated extraction-azeotropic distillation for separating isobutanol-ethanol-water. Separation and Purification Technology, 255, 117695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117695
[20] Popescu, A.E.P., Pellin, J.L., Bonet, J., Llorens, J., 2021. Bioethanol dehydration and mixing by heterogeneous azeotropic distillation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128810
[21] Sun, S., Fu, L., Yang, A., Shen, W., 2023. An intensified energy-saving architecture for side-stream extractive distillation of four-azeotrope mixtures considering economic, environmental and safety criteria simultaneously. Separation and Purification Technology, 310, 123132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123132
[22] Salman, M., Javed, N., Liu, X., He, M., 2023. Azeotrope separation of ethyl propionate and ethanol by extractive distillation and pressure swing distillation method. Separation and Purification Technology, 311, 123361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123361
[23] Xing, C., Song, Z., Wu, Y., Wu, B., Chen, K., Ji, L., 2024. Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental analysis of the vapor recompression-assisted liquid-only transfer extractive dividing wall column for separating minimum-boiling point azeotropes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 63(15), 6725-6742. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c00218
[24] Guo, C., Zheng, Y., Wang, S., He, G., Gui, C., 2025. Energy-efficient heat pump-assisted pre-concentration integrated with sequential [EMIM][BF4] and ethylene glycol-based extractive distillation for enhanced recovery of ethanol and isopropyl alcohol from wastewater. Separation and Purification Technology, 357, 130073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.130073
[25] Liu, J., Yan, J., Liu, W., Kong, J., Wu, Y., Li, X., Sun, L., 2022. Design and multi-objective optimization of reactive-extractive dividing wall column with organic Rankine cycles considering safety. Separation and Purification Technology, 287, 120512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120512
[26] Mrayed, S., Shams, M.B., Al-Khayyat, M., Alnoaimi, N., 2021. Application of pinch analysis to improve the heat integration efficiency in a crude distillation unit. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 4, 100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100168
[27] Chen, L., Ye, Q., Jiang, Z., Yuan, J., Zhang, H., Wang, N., 2020. Novel methodology for determining the optimal vapor recompressed assisted distillation process based on economic and energy efficiency. Separation and Purification Technology, 251, 117393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117393
[28] Li, X., Geng, X., Cui, P., Yang, J., Zhu, Z., Wang, Y., Xu, D., 2019. Thermodynamic efficiency enhancement of pressure-swing distillation process via heat integration and heat pump technology. Applied Thermal Engineering, 154, 519-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.03.118
[29] Gil, I., Uyazán, A., Aguilar, J., Rodríguez, G., Caicedo, L., 2008. Separation of ethanol and water by extractive distillation with salt and solvent as entrainer: process simulation. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 25(1), 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322008000100021
[30] Kunnakorn, D., Rirksomboon, T., Siemanond, K., Aungkavattana, P., Kuanchertchoo, N., Chuntanalerg, P., Hemra, K., Kulprathipanja, S., James, R.B., Wongkasemjit, S., 2013. Techno-economic comparison of energy usage between azeotropic distillation and hybrid system for water–ethanol separation. Renewable Energy, 51, 310-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.09.055
[31] Babaie, O., Esfahany, M.N., 2021. Optimum process configuration for ETBE production based on TAC minimization. Separation and Purification Technology, 256, 117744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117744
[32] Babaie, O., Esfahany, M.N., 2020. Optimization and heat integration of hybrid R-HIDiC and pervaporation by combining GA and PSO algorithm in TAME synthesis. Separation and Purification Technology, 236, 116288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116288
[33] Kim, D., Gundersen, T., 2018. Development and use of exergy efficiency for complex cryogenic processes. Energy conversion and management, 171, 890-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.109
[34] Soave, G., Feliu, J.A., 2002. Saving energy in distillation towers by feed splitting. Applied Thermal Engineering, 22(8), 889-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(02)00006-6
Chemical Process Design
Volume 4, Issue 1
June 2025
Pages 1-14

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics